Harvard & AAS | Magnetic Reversal Extinction


Apr 30, 2019

Magnetic Reversal & Extinction – Rebuttal of Lingam 2019 Paper Abstract: “Hence, we suggest that hypotheses seeking to explain … mass extinctions via changes in Earth’s magnetic field intensity are potentially unlikely.” This is not supported by the study. All that would need to change is to add the words “… via radiation dose and atmospheric loss” at the end, before the period. Lingam 2019 –

The study we refute: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.03353.pdf

*Most Advanced Part: Lingam 2019 use of UV is extensive, but for extrapolation of dosage and broad generalized statements. Specific food chain issues and the relationship to the ensemble of events is not made. Claim: The UV examination is incomplete, and further, is not applied appropriately in the broader picture.

Our original (long) submission: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y…
Our final, shortened, thrice-revised-at-AAS-request submission: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y…
Submitted to RNAAS, editor Dr. Chris Lintott (Oxford University) Email: Ben

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s