Daily Archives: August 13, 2017

Learning for the Curious and Concerned: Exploring Climate and Environmental Chan ge with “Transition Studies” online | EV & N #252 – CCTV

http://ecoethics.net/2014-ENVRE120/20170813-EV&N-252-Link.html

https://www.cctvcambridge.org/node/498443

https://www.cctvcambridge.org/user/3723/history

New forms of public education platforms like “Transition Studies” are emerging on the Internet to inform curious and concerned citizens.

Advertisements

Charlottesville mayor blames Trump for violent weekend

Mass drought aggravates malnutrition in Guatemala

Food-matters

EPA Asks Climate Change Deniers For Help With Climate Policy


The Ring of Fire

Published on Jul 30, 2017

Scott Pruitt, the head of the EPA, is reaching out to a climate change denying right wing think tank – The Heartland Institute – for help on climate policy. Heartland specializes in spreading misinformation about climate change, and they want the organization to help them recruit a team to “review” scientific documents related to climate change to make them more industry friendly. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this.

The Koch Brothers’ “Dark Money” | Jane Mayer


The National

Published on Feb 26, 2016

Investigative journalist Jane Mayer explains how the Koch brothers have used their billions to shift American policies to the far right.
»»» Subscribe to The National to watch more videos here: https://www.youtube.com/user/CBCTheNa…

Farmers are on Warpath But Do they Have Your Attention?

Food-matters

US federal department is censoring use of term ‘climate change’, emails reveal | The Guardian

Among the ‘intense weather events’ qualifying as climate change under the advice in the email chain is drought. Photograph: David Mcnew/AFP/Getty Images

Exclusive: series of emails show staff at Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service advised to reference ‘weather extremes’ instead

Oliver Milman in New York

Staff at the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) have been told to avoid using the term climate change in their work, with the officials instructed to reference “weather extremes” instead.

A series of emails obtained by the Guardian between staff at the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), a USDA unit that oversees farmers’ land conservation, show that the incoming Trump administration has had a stark impact on the language used by some federal employees around climate change.

A missive from Bianca Moebius-Clune, director of soil health, lists terms that should be avoided by staff and those that should replace them. “Climate change” is in the “avoid” category, to be replaced by “weather extremes”. Instead of “climate change adaption”, staff are asked to use “resilience to weather extremes”.

The primary cause of human-driven climate change is also targeted, with the term “reduce greenhouse gases” blacklisted in favor of “build soil organic matter, increase nutrient use efficiency”. Meanwhile, “sequester carbon” is ruled out and replaced by “build soil organic matter”.

In her email to staff, dated 16 February this year, Moebius-Clune said the new language was given to her staff and suggests it be passed on. She writes that “we won’t change the modeling, just how we talk about it – there are a lot of benefits to putting carbon back in the sail [sic], climate mitigation is just one of them”, and that a colleague from USDA’s public affairs team gave advice to “tamp down on discretionary messaging right now”.

In contrast to these newly contentious climate terms, Moebius-Clune wrote that references to economic growth, emerging business opportunities in the rural US, agro-tourism and “improved aesthetics” should be “tolerated if not appreciated by all”.

In a separate email to senior employees on 24 January, just days after Trump’s inauguration, Jimmy Bramblett, deputy chief for programs at the NRCS, said: “It has become clear one of the previous administration’s priority is not consistent with that of the incoming administration. Namely, that priority is climate change. Please visit with your staff and make them aware of this shift in perspective within the executive branch.”

(read more).

See related: