Daily Archives: November 11, 2016

The World Waits and Wonders About Donald Trump – The New York Times

By THE EDITORIAL BOARD  NOV. 11, 2016

Angela Merkel before her statement about President-elect Trump the day after the election. Credit Sean Gallup/Getty Images

The forces that brought Donald Trump to victory were largely American. The repercussions of his election, however, have rocked Western democracies accustomed to seeing the United States as a beacon for democracy, progress and stability. If the president-elect wants to take seriously his responsibilities as head of the free world, he should waste no time in making clear how much of his campaign bluster was just that.

The forces that brought Donald Trump to victory were largely American. The repercussions of his election, however, have rocked Western democracies accustomed to seeing the United States as a beacon for democracy, progress and stability. If the president-elect wants to take seriously his responsibilities as head of the free world, he should waste no time in making clear how much of his campaign bluster was just that.

In the immediate wake of the election, the chorus of excited reactions from Europe’s far right, which has made common cause with Mr. Trump’s anti-globalization, anti-immigration and anti-establishment messages, reflected a sense that its cause had been given a huge boost.

Marine Le Pen, head of France’s far-right National Front, saw in Mr. Trump’s election a “great movement across the world” to upend the status quo. In the Netherlands, Geert Wilders of the similar Party for Freedom declared the election “historic.” In Britain, Nigel Farage, whose U.K. Independence Party was a major force behind the vote to leave the European Union, declared he “couldn’t be happier.” Germany’s Alternative for Germany and Austria’s Freedom Party chimed in with similar cheers.

Beyond the threat of further advances by the far right in European electoral politics, mainstream European politicians and commentators were aghast at the potential of a Trump presidency to upend the political, economic and social order of the post-Communist world — much of it based on America’s deep and steadfast relationship with European democracies. Economic turmoil and the flood of refugees from a disintegrating Syria had already fired up the same sort of nativist sentiments that Mr. Trump rode to power. But nobody had really anticipated that the same passions were smoldering in that firm bulwark of Western values, the United States.

Now the entire structure of convictions and policies that were to underpin the Western world in the 21st century — the international trading regime, the united Western front against Russian revanchism, the security of NATO, the Paris accord on climate change — seems uncertain. In its stead are fears of costly trade wars, of new Russian pressures on countries from Estonia to Ukraine, of a steadily warming planet beset by drought, sea-level rise and human displacement.

…(read more).

Josh Fox – Did Obama “Sell Out” On The “Standing Rock” Pipeline?


The Big Picture RT

Published on Nov 11, 2016
Big Picture Interview: Josh Fox, Gasland/Gasland II & How to Let Go of the World and Love All the Things Climate Can’t Change. So – is this the end of the road for the Standing Rock water protectors? Or has the real fight just begun?

Obama Betrays Standing Rock


The Big Picture RT

Published on Nov 11, 2016

Thom discusses Donald Trump’s “drain the swamp lie,” how Democrats will resist Republican control of the government, and the wave of hate that’s followed Trump’s election with Dave McCulloch and Richard Eskow. Thom also talks with filmmaker Josh Fox about Obama approving the Dakota Access Pipeline and the future of Standing Rock Protests.

11 November, 2016 22:37

http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2016/AikenOrder.2016.10November.pdf
AikenOrder.2016.10November.pdf

Should the world be worried by a President Trump? – UpFront

Outrage, Fear Fuel Ongoing Anti-Trump Protests

Climate Security Consensus Project Statement, The Center for Climate and Security


The Center for Climate and Security

Published on Nov 7, 2016

The Center for Climate and Security, Sept 14, 2016: A bipartisan group of national security and defense leaders discuss the newly-released “Climate Security Consensus Project” statement. The panel was held at the first annual Climate and National Security Forum at the Reserve Officers Association in Washington, DC. For the statement, see: www.climateandsecurity.org/consensus

Moderator of the presentation panel for the Climate Security Consensus Project Statement, the Honorable Sherri Goodman:Sherri-Goodman

 

Trump Pledges Huge Boost in Military Spending


Associated Press

Published on Sep 7, 2016

Donald Trump vowed to boost military spending by tens of billions of dollars Wednesday, outlining plans for major increases in the number of active US troops and equipment, and promising a strategy to end the Islamic State group. (Sept. 7)

Trump advocates for increased military spending


CNN

Published on Sep 7, 2016

Donald Trump has criticized the decrease in defense spending, saying funding for the US Air Force, Army and Navy is at its lowest level in decades. Tom Foreman fact checked Trump’s claims.

House Votes To Deny Climate Science And Ties Pentagon’s Hands On Climate Change

The Pentagon. CREDIT: SHUTTERSTOCK

Ryan Koronowski
Research Director at ThinkProgress. Contact me rkoronowski.
May 22, 2014

Sea level rise impacting naval bases. Climate change altering natural disaster response. Drought influenced by climate change in the Middle East and Africa leading to conflicts over food and water — as in, for instance, Syria.

The military understands the realities of climate change and the negative impacts of heavy dependence on fossil fuels.

The U.S. House does not.

With a mostly party-line vote on Thursday, the House of Representatives passed an amendment sponsored by Rep. David McKinley (R-WV) that seeks to prevent the Department of Defense from using funding to address the national security impacts of climate change.

“You can’t change facts by ignoring them,” said Mike Breen, Executive Director of the Truman National Security Project, and leader of the clean energy campaign, Operation Free. “This is like trying to lose 20 pounds by smashing your bathroom scale.”

The full text of McKinley’s amendment reads:

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to implement the U.S. Global Change Research Program National Climate Assessment, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fifth Assessment Report, the United Nation’s Agenda 21 sustainable development plan, or the May 2013 Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order

In other words, the House just tried to write climate denial into the Defense Department’s budget. “The McKinley amendment would require the Defense Department to assume that the cost of carbon pollution is zero,” Reps. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Bobby Rush (D-IL) said in a letter to their colleagues before the vote. “That’s science denial at its worst and it fails our moral obligation to our children and grandchildren.”

The amendment forces the Defense Department to ignore the findings and recommendations of the National Climate Assessment and the IPCC’s latest climate assessment, specifically with regard to the national security impacts of climate change. It would also do the same for the Social Cost of Carbon, which provides a framework for rulemakers to take into account the societal, security, and economic costs associated with emitting more carbon dioxide.

If the Pentagon cannot use its funding to implement the recommendations from the NCA and the IPCC reports, the specific impacts on DoD would be vague — and troublesome — because the reports are crystal clear.