Daily Archives: July 23, 2016

Historical records missed one fifth of global warming

Warming-Data
Nasa data has highlighted problems in historical climate records over the past 150 years
By Lee Bell and Victoria Woollaston Friday 22 July 2016

Almost a fifth of the global warming that has happened during the past 150 years has been missed by historical records because of “quirks” in how temperatures have been recorded.

That’s according to a new Nasa-led study which applied these quirks to climate models. The agency then performed the same calculations on both the models and the observations to make the first true “apples-to-apples comparison of warming rates”.

The models and observations were found to largely agree on expected near-term global warming and may explain why projections of future climate, based solely on historical records, have a tendency to lower the rates of warming compared to similar predictions made using climate models.

The study, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, was led by Mark Richardson of Nasa’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California. Although scientists have known about these quirks for some time, this is the first study to calculate their impact.

“They’re quite small on their own, but they add up in the same direction,” Richardson said. “We were surprised that they added up to such a big effect.”

…(read more).

Global Climate Change
Environment Ethics
Environment Justice

Advertisements

NASA: Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Historical records miss a fifth of global warming

By Carol Rasmussen,
NASA’s Earth Science News Team

Difficulties in making weather measurements in the Arctic have led to underrepresentation of this rapidly warming area in historic temperature records. Credit: British Columbia Ministry of Transport.

A new NASA-led study finds that almost one-fifth of the global warming that has occurred in the past 150 years has been missed by historical records due to quirks in how global temperatures were recorded. The study explains why projections of future climate based solely on historical records estimate lower rates of warming than predictions from climate models.

The study applied the quirks in the historical records to climate model output and then performed the same calculations on both the models and the observations to make the first true apples-to-apples comparison of warming rates. With this modification, the models and observations largely agree on expected near-term global warming. The results were published in the journal Nature Climate Change. Mark Richardson of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, is the lead author.

The Arctic is warming faster than the rest of Earth, but there are fewer historic temperature readings from there than from lower latitudes because it is so inaccessible. A data set with fewer Arctic temperature measurements naturally shows less warming than a climate model that fully represents the Arctic.

Because it isn’t possible to add more measurements from the past, the researchers instead set up the climate models to mimic the limited coverage in the historical records.

The new study also accounted for two other issues. First, the historical data mix air and water temperatures, whereas model results refer to air temperatures only. This quirk also skews the historical record toward the cool side, because water warms less than air. The final issue is that there was considerably more Arctic sea ice when temperature records began in the 1860s, and early observers recorded air temperatures over nearby land areas for the sea-ice-covered regions. As the ice melted, later observers switched to water temperatures instead. That also pushed down the reported temperature change.

Scientists have known about these quirks for some time, but this is the first study to calculate their impact. “They’re quite small on their own, but they add up in the same direction,” Richardson said. “We were surprised that they added up to such a big effect.”

These quirks hide around 19 percent of global air-temperature warming since the 1860s. That’s enough that calculations generated from historical records alone were cooler than about 90 percent of the results from the climate models that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) uses for its authoritative assessment reports. In the apples-to-apples comparison, the historical temperature calculation was close to the middle of the range of calculations from the IPCC’s suite of models.

…(read more).

Global Climate Change
Environment Ethics
Environment Justice